UH study: Fewer years of healthy life for Native Hawaiians

According to public health researchers at the University of Hawaii at Manoa, Native Hawaiians in Hawaii have a shorter life expectancy compared with other racial/ethnic populations in the state.

New findings, published in the Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, show they also spend fewer years in good health than other groups.

Yanyan Wu, lead author of the study and an associate professor with UH Office of Public Health in the Myron B. Thompson School of Social Work, calculated the healthy life expectancy (HALE) of the major racial/ethic groups in Hawaii.

HALE is a measure of the number of years that people live in a healthy state, and provides a more complete estimate of population health than life expectancy.

“Our results highlight the disparities faced by Hawaii’s indigenous people,” said Wu.

For the study, Wu and her colleagues first calculated overall life expectancies for Native Hawaiians, white, Filipinos, Japanese and Chinese people in Hawaii using data from death records from the Hawaii State Department of Health and population estimates from the U.S. Census.

The researchers then adjusted those overall life expectancies using data from a health survey called the Hawaii Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

One question in the survey asked, “Is your health excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor?” The number of years that people spent in “fair” or “poor” health were subtracted from the overall life expectancies to find the healthy life expectancies.

Native Hawaiians had lowest healthy life expectancy

Results showed the greatest gap in HALE was between Native Hawaiians and Chinese Americans. Chinese Americans had a HALE of 75.9, compared with 62.2 for Native Hawaiians, a gap of 13.7 years.

The HALEs for Japanese is 74.8, Filipino is 73.3 and white is 72.1. In 2010, the overall HALE for people in the U.S. was 68.5 years, the researchers noted. Hawaii has the longest life expectancy of all 50 states.

“Numerous factors affect the HALE for any group,” said Kathryn Braun, a UH Manoa public health professor and the senior author of the new paper. “Socioeconomic status, access to healthcare services, individual behaviors such as diet and physical activity and genetics can all affect HALE. In general, people with higher socioeconomic status have better health.”

Understanding concepts of health necessary to raise HALE

Collectively, Native Hawaiians have the lowest levels of educational attainment, lowest mean household income and highest prevalence of poverty of any group in Hawaii. They also have the highest rates of coronary heart disease, obesity, diabetes and certain types of cancer. For all age groups, Native Hawaiians had higher mortality rates than the other race/ethnicities the researchers examined.

“To raise the HALE of Native Hawaiians, it is essential that public health professionals and researchers understand indigenous peoples’ concepts of health, knowledge, science and research,” Wu said.

“Government policy makers in Hawaii need to expand access of indigenous peoples to excellent education, well-paying jobs with health insurance and home ownership,” Braun said. “Ultimately, health status is a function of financial stability.”

The researchers noted that a limitation of the study was that people’s cultures influence how they answer questions about their health. For example, research has shown that Chinese Americans tend to report worse health status than other groups, which could cause an underestimation of their HALE.

  1. Ken Conklin November 13, 2019 6:29 am Reply

    Everyone knows that most so-called “Native Hawaiians” have most of their ancestry from Asia and Europe. Blood quantums of 1/4 or 1/8 are very frequent. But what very few people know is that these victimhood “studies” showing bad statistics for disease, health, etc. are based on a very bad way of doing data analysis. If someone has heart disease or diabetes and the researchers ask “What is your ethnicity?” if the victim has even a small portion of Hawaiian blood, he will be counted as fully Native Hawaiian AND HE WILL NOT BE COUNTED AS BEING ANY OF HIS OTHER ETHNICITIES. Even someone who is 1/8 “Hawaiian” and 7/8 Caucasian will be counted as adding one full tally mark to Native Hawaiian victimhood and nothing at all for Caucasian victimhood. This way of allocating race is defended by saying that if we count someone as being whatever is the highest percentage of his ancestry then there would be too few “Native Hawaiians” to be statistically significant, so we must do it the way.

    The best way to do racial allocation of victimhood would be to give a fraction of a tally mark to each race in the victim’s ancestry, equal to the fraction of that race in his ancestry. But researchers are too lazy to do it correctly, and also know there’s no grant money to study Caucasian disease; all the money goes to study Hawaiian disease.

    You can find a “smoking gun” confession of the one drop = 100% Hawaiian statistical technique, and a thorough analysis of it, on a webpage with the following title. The title is self-explanatory. Copy/paste it into your browser, or google, to read the details:

    Native Hawaiian victimhood — malpractice in the gathering and statistical analysis of data allegedly showing disproportionate Native Hawaiian victimhood for disease and social dysfunction. How and why the Hawaiian grievance industry uses bogus statistics to scam government and philanthropic organizations, politicians, and public opinion.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, send us an email.