Coffee labeling bill before Senate committee

KAILUA-KONA, Hawai‘i — A bill, which would establish a timeline by which roasted coffee, instant coffee and ready-to-drink coffee beverages that use a geographic origin in labeling or advertising are required to contain a certain percentage of coffee by weight from that geographic origin is making, is on the move.

The Senate Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection is scheduled to hold a public hearing on House Bill 2298 at 9 a.m. Wednesday.

HB 2298 originally called for phasing in the percentage of regional coffee to 25 percent by July 1, 2024, 50 percent by 2025, 75 percent by 2026 and 100 percent by 2027.

However, House Committee on Consumer Protection and Commerce Chair Rep. Mark Nakashima recommended amending the bill to modify the schedule for the increase in coffee percentages and change responsibility from the retailer to the wholesaler so wholesalers are able to clear stock of 20 percent by June 30, 2027, 25 percent by 2030 and after 2033 sell only 50 percent.

The bill, introduced by Rep. Nicole Lowen, came on the heels of Act 222 in 2022 which required an independent study to assess the economic impact of Hawai‘i’s coffee labeling laws on local coffee farmers and the industry.

Guild Consulting of Honolulu was awarded the $100,000 contract to conduct the study, and on Jan.18, the DOA submitted the final report on “Economic Study on Changes in Coffee Labeling Law.”

The report highlighted that increasing the minimum amount of Kona coffee from 10 percent to either 51 percent or 100 percent would be advantageous for local farmers, with a higher increase providing the most benefit.

Additionally, the report anticipates that proposed labeling changes could result in a price increase for Kona coffee while seeing minimal impact on quantities grown or sold.

“The report unequivocally found increasing the percentage of coffee will increase the dollar value that farmers get. Fifty-one percent is better, 100 percent is more,” said Lowen.

The study refuted claims made for years by coffee roaster/blenders in opposition of minimum percentages.

Gerard Bastiaanse, president of Hawai‘i Coffee Company, has opposed coffee labeling bills every time they were introduced in the Legislature.

“We believe it is important to offer consumers a range of coffee products so they have options to choose based on taste preferences and affordability,” he said in testimony on Feb. 27.

“You sell coffee with the name Kona on it for a much higher price than you would without the name,” responded Lowen. “Year after year you have opposed any changes to the law and then called for a study. Now there is a study and you don’t like the results.”

Kona Coffee Farmer Bruce Corker said that for more than 30 years, Hawai‘i has been the only region in the world to authorize the use of its regional names on packages of one of its specialty agricultural crops with only 10 percent genuine content. He contends that the marketing of 10 percent blends damages the economic interest of Hawai‘i farmers and deceives consumers.

“In response to the current amended bill before the Senate, Rep. Lowen has suggested that coffee farmers and supporters of fair labeling should prepare written testimony requesting that HB 2298 be further amended to restore the original three-year phase-in and, as a compromise, amending the phased-in minimum to 51 percent, effective January 1, 2027,” said Kona Coffee farmer Bruce Corker.

“The only beneficiaries of a nine-year phase-in would be blenders and their huge profits from putting Hawai‘i regional names on packages with significant percentages of inexpensive foreign-grown coffee. The suggestion that blenders need three years to clear inventory from retail shelves is ridiculous.”

He said a compromise by coffee farmers is suggested if the 100 percent content is not restored.

“Move Hawai‘i coffee labeling reform forward on a reasonable time track. The compromise would be a three-year phase in (as set forth in the original bill) but with a 51 percent maximum to go into effect on July 1, 2027,” he suggested. “Hawai‘i needs to protect the economic interests of its farmers.”

Written testimony may be submitted at capitol.hawaii.gov. Zoom testimony will also be heard at the 9:30 public hearing.

“I think going 100 percent is the right thing to do. We have been shortchanging our farmers for too long,” said Lowen.

1 Comments
  1. Steven Wilkinson March 19, 2024 3:26 am Reply

    It’s hard to believe that there’s any debate on whether Hawaiian coffee packages should contain anything other than Hawaiian coffee. It’s a lie if there’s anything else in there unless it’s clearly stated that it’s not all Hawaiian coffee. Pass HB 2298.


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, send us an email.