As the developer of the Coco Palms Resort reported being just weeks away from commencing demolition of the deteriorated site and constructing a 350-room resort, county officials and members of the public continued to debate the possibility of halting the project in two separate meetings this week.
The meetings, one from the Planning Commission on Tuesday, and the other, a committee meeting from the Kaua‘i County Council on Wednesday, followed Utah-based developer Reef Capital Partners’ largely unsuccessful community meeting in Wailua on Oct. 18.
The planning commission, a county office that makes decisions on zoning and land use permits, listened to similar concerns stated at the community meeting.
“(There) would be a barrage of tourists, which will negatively impact Kaua‘i … Kaua‘i would be on par with the destruction of O‘ahu and Maui,” said Bonnie Bator, one of approximately 25 people to testify on Tuesday.
“We implore the county of Kaua‘i Planning Commission to deny this ill-conceived proposal, as it will further destroy Wailua and the east coast of Kaua‘i,” Bator said.
But no action to change the developer’s plans could be taken following the testimony, according to Planning Director Kaaina Hull. He said at the meeting that its purpose was simply to acknowledge receipt of a required annual status report.
“The commission does not have the authority to take action in any fashion today,” Hull said.
Residents’ testimonies in opposition to the plans were lengthy and included concerns of damage to the environment, negative cultural impacts, increases in traffic, flooding risks, and pending investigations by the state Department of Land and Natural Resources.
Reef Capital’s attorney Mauna Kea Trask, on the other hand, spent about 50 minutes at that meeting responding to questions about what he called “misinformation” from testifiers about the resort’s development.
“It’s on the historic register, state and national. So it’s a rehabilitation and reconstruction project,” said Trask in an interview with The Garden Island following the meeting.
“We’re not trying to be oppositional. We’re just completing the project,” he added.
‘It’s legal, it’s done’
Hull met with the Kaua‘i County Council the following day, where he had been requested by council member Bernard Carvalho to provide an update on the developer’s zoning, variance, and special management use permits.
“The whole objective here is to clear up any misconceptions or misinformation, or to verify or validate certain things as it relates to Coco Palms,” said Kaua‘i County Council Chair Mel Rapozo.
Rapozo and other council members questioned Hull about how Reef Capital’s permits could still be valid after first being issued to a prior developer nearly a decade ago.
Hull stated that the developer’s permits are valid due to the Planning Commission having set financial requirements that the developer pay “into various things” that ranged between $1,000 to $1 million between 2015 and 2018, which vested the permits.
“So any attempt of the planning commission to deny these permits now comes with a legal responsibility and possibly very large financial responsibility.”
Rapozo later suggested the County Council hire an outside attorney, not affiliated with the county or planning department, to review the permits and conduct an audit of the process.
“Have that attorney review all the steps along the way to tell us if in fact, as of 2023, is everything right?”
Rapozo was critical of how the permits could still be valid due to “drastic” changes to the population, sea level, and housing since 2014. He also voiced concerns about traffic.
“I already get traffic coming down (Wailua) Houselots in the morning without Coco Palms there. And I can only imagine when you get 350 rooms and 300 people trying to come out of that events center. I don’t know where you’re gonna go,” Rapozo said.
Council member Felicia Cowden said she was not sure how the project was still moving forward.
“Someone made a bad decision a decade ago, and now we’re stuck with it?” she said.
Members of the public also testified against the resort at the Wednesday meeting and proposed suing Reef Capital to stop the development.
“It’s not hard to sue developers and you can win … so we need to fight,” said Bridget Hammerquist, a Kaua‘i resident who is outspoken about being against the resort.
Hammerquist said she knew of several people willing to contribute millions of dollars to turn the space into a park, a suggestion criticized by council member Bill DeCosta, who doubted they could have altruistic intentions.
“Who are these people contributing those millions of dollars? And what do we owe them now?” he said.
“Now they’re gonna tell us, ‘Hey, we bought your little fish farm … we bought your little Coco Palms. We bought you guys your little nonprofit playground. But we now own your county.”
Trask was also at the Wednesday meeting, where he told council members he would do his “best to dispel some of the myths,” responding to several environmental and cultural complaints.
“There’s so much misinformation, I can’t do it all. But it’s not a bad project. It’s legal, it’s done. We’re trying to do the best we can,” he said.
•••
Emma Grunwald, reporter, can be reached 808-652-0638 or egrunwald@thegardenisland.com.
Editor’s note: A quote attributed to Bonnie Bator has been updated for clarity.
Worked and played there. Would be nice to have it built.
Come on, just let them tear it down already!!! No one wants to keep looking at that eyesore. After they tear it down, that’s the time to come out in full opposition and grind the project to a halt.
griffithr138@yahoo.com
I’ll be glad to see that eyesore gone. However, why does soemthing have to go into its place. Why can’t it just remain as a park and a beautiful green space. Don’t we have enough tourists?
My thoughts on this whole fiasco. The claim that Coco Palms is on the historical register is bogus. This act was to preserve historical places such as the old Hotel which no longer exists. Our island is faced with a huge solid waste problem. The demolition and the rebuilding will exacerbate the problem. In the years to come, the trash created by this hotel and the satellite businesses, will also keep adding to an already serious problem. Look at the mountain of trash at the Kekaha land fill. How about the human waste? Given all the existing gridlock traffic in the area and the only road connecting the north and the east side, this funneling effect will cause an enormous amount of frustration for the local population. Considering the population growth from the past decades, this is by far the worst place to build a hotel. Here is a question that I asked myself: How can a permit be transferred from one corporation to another? I would also add that why wasn’t these meetings published and disseminated for all to see? I would have liked to be at those meetings. It seems like they wanted to keep the numbers of people, protesting this project, to a bare minimum. It all adds up to an already done deal!
Coco Palms: Bigger issue for our island’s future is to restore the wetlands of Wailua.
In mid-October 2023, I was at the Community meeting called by the would-be developers of the Coco Palms hotel site. The scene was clearly full of us, the “no hotel side” and the crowd refused to let the Utah group control them. The guys from Utah were specifically asked to not divide the audience into 4 groups because we wanted to hear what each other had to say. They said they would divide us up into smaller groups. The audience asked to present their views first. The corporate guys insisted on sticking to their agenda. They insisted on speaking first and attempted to make their presentation. The crowd was very vocal and would not let their presentation go forward. “Mauna Kea Trask, shame on you” was called out many times.
For me, though I wholeheartedly agree with no new hotel at the Coco Palms site, there is a bigger issue for our island’s future which is to restore the wetlands of Wailua. When the coming sea level rise floods the highway, I want to know how we can drive to and through Kapa’a, before water starts ponding on the mauka side of the road causing flooding of roads, homes and businesses. The restoration of the watersheds on the site of Coco Palms and beyond seems the pono thing to do. Working with mother nature takes time to learn her ways. Watch this video: Reclaiming Wetlands at Wailuanuiahoʻāno a.k.a. Coco Palms – 7/12/23 on Vimeo. Working with humans takes environmental assessments, laws, time and funding = lots of $$$ and lots of time. This restoration of the wetlands will take a while to complete.
We need to start now, and not let some corporate guys from Utah build another hotel.
Take Home Messages from a recent talk by UH Climate Change expert:
1. Rising atmospheric CO2 is altering climate in many ways.
2. More frequent extreme events are a natural consequence of long-term climate change.
3. These extreme events will impact communities for decades before the projected mean climate changes.
4. While climate mitigation and abatement are a global problem, climate adaptation must happen locally.
5. Because extreme events are becoming more prevalent, adaptation must begin NOW!