WASHINGTON — There’s plenty of noise but no cause for confusion as President Donald Trump vents about how the election turned out and vows to subvert it even still.
This truth is self-evident: Joe Biden is on track to become president Jan. 20. The machinery of government and democracy is moving inexorably toward that end despite Trump’s attempts to undermine the voters’ will.
Trump on Wednesday demanded an “OVERTURN’ of the outcome in a collection of tweets arguing he could only have lost the election if it were “FIXED.” He attempted to support his case by saying odds-makers on election night heavily favored his reelection, “the so-called ‘bookies,’” as if a gambler’s bet mattered. It doesn’t.
Americans who don’t wish to get caught up in the nitty gritty of Trump’s attempts to undermine the election can take their cue from one of the many judges who have dismissed the complaints of his team or his allies that the voting or counting was corrupt.
“This ship has sailed,” said U.S. District Judge Linda Parker in throwing out a lawsuit challenging Biden’s win in Michigan this week.
Not only has the ship sailed but it has reached safe harbor and dropped anchor.
Biden’s victory was essentially locked in Tuesday by the so-called safe harbor deadline set by federal law for states to finish their certifications and resolve legal disputes. It’s an insurance policy to guard against Congress trying to manipulate the electoral votes that will be cast next week and sent to the Capitol for counting on Jan. 6.
These steps — the deadline, the convening of the Electoral College in state capitals, Congress’ count in early January — are rituals that are routinely ignored by the public at large. They became less ignorable when Trump began exploring any and all avenues to stay in power.
But the election is over and has been for weeks. Here’s why:
—Biden won a decisive majority of electoral votes in states that certified their results.
—The Democrat is set to finish with even more electoral votes, 306, a total Trump called a landslide when he won the same in 2016.
—No systemic fraud or even consequential error has been established in an election that state monitors and courts have repeatedly found was run fairly. More than that, the election played out with striking efficiency given that it was held in the middle of a deadly pandemic.
—Trump’s attempts to browbeat Republican officials in Georgia and Michigan into upending Biden’s victory in those states came to nothing.
—Trump’s legal arguments in favor of overturning the result have been shredded by judges across the country, including by some he appointed and hoped would therefore side with him.
Trump reshaped much of the federal bench with his own nominees during his term and placed three justices on the Supreme Court. None of that has helped him reverse his defeat by Biden.
Altogether, Trump’s campaign or his allies have seen more than 35 of their court cases fail. Trump has won one, concerning deadlines for proof of identification for certain absentee ballots and mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania, and it did not change the outcome.
This week the Supreme Court turned aside a bid to reverse Pennsylvania’s certification of Biden’s victory. Trump now says his campaign will join a case in the Supreme Court led by the Texas attorney general, who bases the case on false and unsupported allegations that have been discredited in other courts.
—Even as Trump cries foul over Biden naming his Cabinet and other senior personnel, the Trump administration is working with the incoming Biden administration on the transition. Republican lawmakers are adjusting to the transfer of power while still declining for the most part to acknowledge Biden’s victory out loud.
The Texas case, backed by 18 states and over 100 GOP House members is hardly baseless or unsupported. The Russia/Trump campaign hoax concocted by the Clinton campaign to divert attention from her home brewed server? Now that proved to be a hoax after 2 years of investigations, but the media played it up every day
The Texas suit alleges that the four states (WI, MI, PA and GA) used the covid 19 pandemic to change election laws in violation of their very own statutes. Moreover, they say that election officials and governors did so without the consent of their legislatures, in violation of the US constitution.
The evidence of fraud will be presented and heard as well. Obviously the court cannot render an opinion on the fraud allegations without hearing and questioning the evidence for itself. We’ll see about the “no evidence of widespread fraud” narrative
I believe the high court will agree with Texas in that the constitution is clear on who has the authority in selecting electors (state legislatures), to be counted by congress on January 6, just days after the new congress convenes
I also believe that the court will kick it back to the state legislatures for remedy within their powers, for the same reason the court agrees with them——the constitution gives them the authority.