Guest Viewpoint for Saturday — February 18, 2006

The Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) is committed to working with fishermen and others to protect marine resources and we must retain all management tools in order to be successful.

However, several bills introduced in the Legislature, HB2881, HB2587 and SB3047, would redirect DLNR’s responsibility from protecting the resources to simply promoting fishing, no matter what the consequences are to our ocean resources.

These bills should be killed because, if they pass, the measures will result in ultimately killing marine resources instead of protecting them.

A recent audit of DLNR’s Division of Conservation and Resources Enforcement clearly underscored the need for all of us to take a more proactive role in natural resource management.

These bills send DLNR in exactly the opposite direction.

Closing designated ocean areas to fishing year-round has proven to be far superior to seasonal closures in regard to the management of many fishery stocks.

Yet, these bills call for area closures only as a measure of last resort.

This is all the more ironic in light of the fact that the Legislature itself previously acknowledged the effectiveness of this approach by passing legislation in 1998 that established a network of closed areas for the aquarium fishery in West Hawaii.

As noted in DLNR’s 2004 report to the Legislature, these closed areas have increased the populations of aquarium fish both inside and outside the closed areas, while the overall take and dollar value of this fishery have increased.

This clearly demonstrates that area closures can be mutually beneficial for both fish and fishermen.

We completely agree that management actions should be based on solid scientific analysis, and that they be followed up with sound and statistically defensible monitoring plans.

DLNR has already implemented this as a matter of standard operating practice.

These bills will drastically curtail and irrevocably harm DLNR’s ability to manage marine resources and will favor a single special interest group of ocean users — the fishermen — over all others and at the long-term expense of the resources.

DLNR supports fishermen and the many other ocean users; but DLNR cannot cater to any single group, as the bills suggest. All of us share the responsibility of protecting our ocean resources.

We also share a common goal — we all want fish for the future.

However, handcuffing DLNR’s ability to responsibly manage aquatic resources, and subverting those responsibilities to the desires of a single faction, is a betrayal of the public trust for the citizens of Hawaii.

Peter Young is the chairman of the DLNR in Honolulu.


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, send us an email.