Comments sought on PMRF radar proposal

LIHU‘E — A federal project to secure a location for a radar capable of detecting and classifying missile threats is seeking a spot close to home.

The Missile Defense Agency of the U.S. Department of Defense reopened its public-scoping period for the Homeland Defense Radar in Hawai‘i, with two sites in mind: Kahuku Training Area Site 1 on O‘ahu and the U.S. Navy Pacific Missile Range Facility near Kekaha. There is also a no-action alternative.

The $1.9-billion, missile-radar system project got the green light in 2018. In the past year, two sites on O‘ahu were removed from consideration, and PMRF was added as an alternative site.

The 50-acre complex needs about 100 additional acres for temporary construction, according to the MDA. The proposed layout includes a maintenance facility, power plant, equipment shelter, radar face, data terminal and bulk-fuel-storage area.

While there is opposition, state Rep. Dee Morikawa, who represents Kaua‘i’s Westside, portions of the South Shore and Ni‘ihau, said the project is “very necessary” for both the state and nation.

“Some will say that the radar will make Hawai‘i a target. However, Hawai‘i is already a target because of our key location in the middle of the Pacific,” Morikawa said Tuesday. “No matter how much we care about protecting our culture and the environment, none of that matters if we are open to foreign missile attacks.”

The project was jumpstarted in 2018 after a false missile alert was issued in the state.

“It was an indescribable panic and a realization that it could happen,” Morikawa said.”The threats from North Korea and beyond are real, and America must be able to defend itself, its deployed forces, allies and friends from missile attacks.”

Morikawa suggested that PMRF is being considered since it’s already on federal property. If chosen as the location, MDA will utilize the southernmost PMRF access gate at Lighthouse Road, according to a distribution statement.

“I know there will be many people opposed to this project, but we need to wait and see what comes out of the environmental statement,” Morikawa said, noting that environmental, cultural and historic concerns will be respected. “The opportunity for future generations to have access to high-tech employment is a great benefit.”

Kip Goodwin of the Democratic Party Environmental Caucus believes that the proposed site at the southern tip of PMRF is vulnerable to weather events.

“The proposed site for the HDR-H is at the southern tip …. the western edge of the Mana Plain, so very-low elevation,” Goodwin said. “In other words, the facility would be close to the ocean and vulnerable to tsunami, hurricane, sea-level rise.”

Goodwin expressed concerns for the proposed specifications of the project, and remains hesitant.

“This is simply like nothing Kaua‘i and PMRF have ever seen before,” Goodwin said in an email.

The project is in its fourth stage: public scoping and preparing a draft environmental study, which requires public comment. According to a distribution statement, a telephone public meeting for participants to ask questions of MDA representatives and provide comments is Thursday from 6 to 8 p.m., accessible by calling 855-756-7520 and using access code 70114.

Comments to be considered for the draft environmental study for a layered missile defense system are being taken through Monday, April 12. More information on the project can be found at hdrheis.com.

•••

Sabrina Bodon, public safety and government reporter, can be reached at 245-0441 or sbodon@thegardenisland.com.

6 Comments
  1. RGLadder37 March 24, 2021 12:13 am Reply

    This is a good idea. It will detect an incoming missile come from 1000 miles away. This should give us a few minutes to detect it, zone in on it, and intercept it. With a missile of our own. I strongly agree with the radar.


  2. RGLadder37 March 24, 2021 12:17 am Reply

    That is why I voted for Tulsi Gabbard. For situations like this. A go on the military and put a radar there. It will be like Top Gun. Make every effort to convince people of Kauai this is a good thing.


  3. Mark March 24, 2021 7:40 am Reply

    I want to view the environmental Impact study first / then make comments as well. Overall seems like a bad idea- we don’t need to do this just for the jobs!!!!


  4. Mailman Mike March 24, 2021 7:47 am Reply

    It could make Kauai a target. I don’t want it here.


  5. Paulo March 24, 2021 8:08 am Reply

    Kauai is bathed in radar from PMRF wrapping around the entire island except for a small section of the Eastside and extending far out to sea so that even out fishing, miles from land, we cannot escape it. Besides radio interference, we need specific information on the hazards of continuous radar on all life forms including human.

    The EIS should state the likelihood of any incoming missile launch to contain multiple missiles and multiple decoys. The EIS must state the exact odds of intercepts when multiple decoys and multiple missiles are launched simultaneously, by giving the intercept likelihood listed per numbers of decoys and missiles, i.e. a launch of 10 decoys and 3 nuclear warheads would have a 10% chance of intercepting one warhead, etc.


  6. tunataxi March 24, 2021 8:51 am Reply

    Imagine a large tsunami from Alaska pushing through the base and Mana Plain shoving all that fuel and crap into Kekaha and Waimea. Why would they even think of putting it at sea level is mind boggling. Iʻll tell you why.. because the citizens of the west side canʻt stop it


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, send us an email.