Electric vehicle sweeteners running out

If you are one of the lucky people who have managed to buy an electric vehicle and get a special plate for it, you probably know that several benefits came with that special plate, including the ability to park at government parking lots (including at the airport!) and street spaces for free, and the ability to jump into carpool lanes even though there is just one person in the car. You also might have gotten a federal tax credit for your car purchase.

Sadly, good things don’t last forever. The free parking benefit and the carpool lane benefit expired on June 30, according to the terms of the 2012 law that spawned them.

For tax benefits, the pendulum has started swinging in the other direction as well. The federal credit is up to $7,500 per qualified vehicle, depending on battery size.

But a phase-out clock starts ticking on the federal credit given for a car manufacturer once the manufacturer has sold 200,000 units. Tesla was the first to hit the milestone, followed by GM, both in the second half of 2018. As a result, electric-vehicle credits are no longer available for new purchases from these manufacturers. But there are plenty of other manufacturers. The IRS has a list of qualifying vehicles.

From the state of Hawai‘i, electric-vehicle owners now can expect a $50 surcharge on their annual vehicle registration fees, thanks to a 2019 law that went into effect on Jan. 1.

More is yet to come. The state Department of Transportation has been pursuing the idea of funding improvements to highways and bridges with a road usage charge, now called HiRUC, that will charge citizens per mile driven instead of (well, we think it’s instead of, but our lawmakers may have other ideas) charging for fuel purchases through our current fuel tax. Owners of hybrids, electric vehicles and alternative-fuel vehicles can expect to pay quite a bit more under HiRUC than they are now paying under the fuel-tax system. We have written about it in more detail here.

Electric vehicles also benefit from laws such as HRS section 291-71 requiring places of public accommodation (shopping centers, for example) to dedicate some parking stalls for electric-vehicle charging. These laws don’t seem to be going away any time soon.

Instead, the momentum seems to be toward requiring more electric-vehicle infrastructure such as chargers. The City &County of Honolulu, for example, recently adopted Ordinance 20-10, mandating that builders of new residential or commercial buildings follow new “electric-vehicle-readiness-compliance pathways.” See section C406.8, Electric Vehicle Infrastructure, beginning on page 8 of the bill. (We had written about a previous incarnation of that bill as well.) For residential buildings, for example, if new construction or renovation adds eight or more new parking stalls, then at least 25% of the new stalls must be electric-vehicle-charger ready.

If new construction or renovation of commercial buildings adds 12 or more new parking stalls, at least 25% of the newly-added parking stalls must be electric-vehicle-charger ready. There are some exceptions and reductions in the requirements for cases such as retail establishments and affordable housing.

Government benefits for electric vehicles, then, appear to be past their peak. Some of them are starting to erode. Those who are in the market for a new vehicle now and are banking on government benefits should definitely do their homework to see if the benefits they are counting on still exist or are on their way out.

•••

Tom Yamachika is president of the Tax Foundation of Hawai‘i.

1 Comments
  1. Steve Parsons July 19, 2020 12:39 pm Reply

    Anyone buying ICE (Internal Combustion Engine) will pay DOUBLE OVER 400K miles. Tesla batteries and motors will last 400,000 original miles. Lie or truth. ICE Dogma gasps but do you believe this data to be true. Multiple science based research on charge cycles and the low heat/friction of electric motors along with real world data (though very small sample size). By 2023 statistically significant data will be in and it will end ICE. Simply end it.

    2. TCO is on total lifespan of the vehicle or not? These 5 year takeoffs are a joke. The US avg is 6 years and it has nothing to do with asset depreciation. IF 400,000 miles is real then the depreciation rate on Tesla BEV is a slow crawl compared to ICE. TCO without resale value is a garbage stat. It;s also ridiculous not to do these figures out to 200,000 miles. 60 cents/mile on ICE. 30 cents a mile on Tesla.3. ICE vs Tesla is a false narrative from the onset. double the lifespan on half the cost per mile lifetime, safest vehicles ever test, best performance due to battery center of gravity low between the wheels, 0-60 times that leave ICE in the dust, OTA, industry leading (by far) AI, ZERO corporate dependence on the first 100,000 miles…ZERO, no brakes, no gas stations no oil changes. By the spare set of tires up front and literally for 7 years you don’t need squat. OK so a trip needs the supercharger network (which is again, light years ahead of anyone else). Because I compare a yugo to a ferrari does not imply they are in the same class. Hey look! 4 wheels and a gas pedal…same thing with minor differences right? Let’s compare. Even acknowledgement of this comparison lends legitimacy.
    steve
    Kauai


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, send us an email.