Signs down in Maha‘ulepu

MAHA‘ULEPU — The state Department of Health has removed water quality warning signs from the area of the Waiopili Stream at Maha‘ulepu Beach because their tests show no significant health risk in the area.

Community group Friends of Maha‘ulepu on Kaua‘i, however, believes that the waters are unsafe or swimming because of high bacteria counts and are challenging that decision in a complaint filed Feb. 3 with the Environmental Protection Agency.

They’re asking, not only for EPA to force DOH to put the signs back up, but to further investigate the source of elevated levels of the fecal indicating bacteria (FIB) enterococci in the stream.

“The risk to the public is real and until the source is identified there is no way to know how serious the risk is,” Bridget Hammerquist, president of the Friends group said in the complaint. “The warning signs at Maha‘ulepu need to be restored.”

The argument can be boiled down one central question about whether the watershed’s high level of enterococci really indicates a public health hazard.

In 2016, DOH conducted a sanitary survey to answer that question, using a source tracking study called Phylochip, which was “unable to identify human sources in the area that would account for the elevated levels of enterococci in the Mahaulepu watershed,” according to Myron Honda, environmental health specialist with the Clean Water Branch of DOH.

“Because human sources could not be identified as the cause of the elevated enterococci levels in the Maha‘ulepu Watershed, the level of risk was determined to be significantly less than if the sources were due to human sources – sewage,” Honda said.

Friends of Maha‘ulepu disagrees with the main conclusion of the study, which reads: “High concentrations of FIB in both Waiopilli Ditch and Waikomo Stream were not caused by human or animal fecal contamination. Most samples with high FIB concentrations had no observable human or animal fecal signals.”

They point to the presence of a biosolids dump site in operation through 2014 in the watershed as a potential source of water contamination and maintain that the study didn’t test enough sources.

The Friends group partners with local scientists to do water testing at the Waiopili and Waikoko Streams, as well as in other areas throughout the island.

Every week, water tests come back with enterococci levels in the thousands – way above the state-set threshold of 130 parts per 100 ml of water. When put beside water testing results from other areas around Kaua‘i, that location has some of the highest enterococci counts on the island.

Since March, 2014, the group says those counts have been on the rise.

Honda says DOH stands by the conclusions of their study and is further discussing the Friends of Maha‘ulepu complaint with EPA.

  1. Kaua Girl February 11, 2020 7:16 am Reply

    Does anyone really care? I’ve been trying to go enjoy Mahaulepu beach at least 4 times throughout last year/this year and the gate is ALWAYS locked. Is it ever open anymore?

    1. Igotatakashowa February 11, 2020 6:58 pm Reply

      Yes, of course we care. This affects a lot of people, both residents and visitors. I’m sorry that the gate closure and the inconvenience it imposes on you prevents you from caring.

  2. Lucky we live Kauai February 11, 2020 8:15 am Reply

    This article fails to mention that prior to the Permitted by DOH of dumping of human waste biosolids in Mahaulepu the Waiopili stream enterococcus reading were below the allowable level of 130. These numbers are available on DOH’s website. Of course, DOH doesn’t want to test the site, they gave the permits to Aqua Engineers to dump there. Although they did not permit the waste pond that was there. The current month’s reading is over 24,000, it is suppose to be below 130 per 100 ml. Young children are playing in this stream every day without a sign to warn their parents. Shame on you DOH. It’s one thing to make a mistake, it’s another to cover it up.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, send us an email.