Andrade buys all four kuleana

LIHUE — Carlos Andrade, a retired history professor and partial heir to several small land parcels on Mark Zuckerberg’s North Shore estate, outbid a group of his distant relatives during a court hearing on Tuesday, purchasing all four of the contested lots for just over $2 million.

Ownership of the kuleana has sparked a years-long legal dispute involving hundreds of parties that has made international headlines and prompted a public apology from the Facebook CEO, who promised to drop his pursuit of the land in a 2017 letter published in The Garden Island.

Andrade bought three of the four kuleana — family-owned parcels of land passed down through successive generations — at a public auction in March. The remaining lot went to a small contingent of his extended family members.

That auction was one of the final steps in a lawsuit filed by Andrade in 2016 to partition the land and “quiet” the titles, placing each of the properties under a single owner, instead of leaving them divided among hundreds of people descended from a Portuguese immigrant, Manuel Rapozo, who bought the land over a century ago.

The hearing in Fifth Circuit Court was held to finalize the results of the auction, but Hawaii’s quiet title laws allow interested parties to reopen bidding at confirmation hearings like the one held Tuesday. Anyone who submits a legitimate offer that is at least 5% higher than the winning bid can override the results of the auction and buy the land.

That’s what happened on Tuesday. Andrade’s lawyer, Harvey Cohen, told the court his client intended to place a bid on the kuleana he was seemingly unable to afford two months ago, when he declined to top a $700,000 bid by the group of his family members.

Attorneys for the two parties — Cohen represented Andrade and Lihue attorney Craig De Costa acted on behalf of the Rapozo descendants — convened in the hallway outside Fifth Circuit Judge Kathleeen Watanabe’s courtroom along with the land commissioner, Patrick Childs, and the auction started all over again. This time, Andrade won all four.

Cohen’s opened bidding on the first lot — the kuleana he had previously been outbid on — for $735,000. It went uncontested. A contest for the second plot of land, which had gone for $300,000, ended when Cohen bid $500,000. De Costa declined to contest the $460,000 sale price of the third lot. Cohen bought the final parcel — it had sold for $300,000 at auction — for his client with a $450,000 bid.

When the dust settled, Andrade had consolidated his hold on all four of the kuleana for a combined total of $2.1 million, more than double the amount he paid at the public auction roughly 10 weeks ago.

How exactly the retired college professor put together over $2 million remains a point of contention. De Costa and his law partner, Daniel Hempey, say they have compiled significant evidence to show that Andrade’s bids and legal fees were in some way financed by Zuckerberg or an LLC he controls.

They submitted a motion to that effect in the quiet title case, essentially alleging that Andrade was able to force the sale of the land and then purchase it using funds that otherwise should have been distributed among the hundreds of people with claims to the land.

Hempey and De Costa also filed a separate lawsuit the day after the auction in March on behalf of two of Andrade’s distant cousins — Wayne Rapozo, a London-based attorney with an ancestral claim to the land who helped to coordinate and finance the legal battle opposing the land partition, and Shannon Buckner, who also has a small share in the kuleana. That lawsuit alleges Andrade violated court procedure by colluding with a Zuckerberg-controlled company during the quiet title legal proceedings.

Following the hallway bidding battle on Tuesday, Hempey asked Judge Watanabe to deny confirmation of the land sale on the grounds that Zuckerberg paid Andrade at least $645,000 over the past six years, a transaction Hempey said “fundamentally skewed the auction.”

Hempey also argued that a corporation controlled by Zuckerberg intentionally initiated the quiet title claim less than 24 hours before a new Hawaii law took effect that would have afforded his clients substantially greater rights in defense of the land partition process.

Cohen adamantly denied that Andrade engaged in anything untoward, insisting the allegations made against his client, who he describes as “the constant gardener,” due to his almost daily use of the land, are being made by “a very vocal minority that are raising issues at the eleventh hour.”

Hempey’s claims were largely echoed by Jordan Inafuku, an attorney representing another small group of Rapozo descendants. Inafuku asked Watanabe to at least continue the confirmation of the land sale until further research into the source of Andrade’s finances can be conducted.

Watanabe denied the requests to delay or deny the court’s decision. She pointed out that the court has previously dismissed similar claims during the course of the lawsuit, which began well over two years ago. She concluded the hearing by confirming the sale of the land, officially making Andrade the sole owner of the four kuleana.

Litigation, however, is far from concluded. A separate lawsuit has been filed against Andrade, asking the court to force him to distribute the money he was allegedly paid by Zuckerberg to essentially keep people off the kuleana. And although Watanabe confirmed the sale, she did appear agreeable to hearing further arguments regarding how Andrade obtained the $2.1 million, an allegation which, if true, could require him to distribute the money to the kuleana shareholders.

  1. manawai June 5, 2019 8:41 am Reply

    “…force the sale of the land and then purchase it using funds that otherwise should have been distributed among the hundreds of people with claims to the land.”

    The Garden Island got that mixed up. No matter what or hen the auctions and bids were, the sale proceeds are divided up amongst ALL of the Rapozo descendants. Every partial owner gets their share of the $2.1 million.

    PS – It’s entirely irrelevant who financed the purchases made by Andrade. Andrade is now free to sell the parcels to whomever, and at whatever price, he chooses.

    1. Da Shadow June 5, 2019 2:35 pm Reply

      IDK man -Kauai County is hell-bent on taking property rights. Consider the County’s pursuit of those evil operators of illegal TVR’s… private property rights infringed!
      (Since, you know, job-supporting, money-spending vacation renters are a huge problem in Hawaii).

  2. LJ June 5, 2019 7:13 pm Reply

    Its not irrelevant. The point is that this whole thing was a scam for Zuckerberg to defeat the system. He couldn’t buy it outright so he used a proxy (Andrade). More bad PR coming his way, thats about it.

  3. big whoop June 5, 2019 7:32 pm Reply


  4. harryoyama June 5, 2019 11:28 pm Reply

    I guess “Uncle Toms” are in every race where greed and profit are the primary driving motivation to throw your own family members under the bus as how this so called “Hawaiian” Carlos Andrade has done in cohots with the billionaire Mark Z. Who BTW is of Jewish descendant, if that means anything.

    The imoral of this story is that a well “educated” Hawaiian with a PhD in Hawaiian history has the gaul to stoop down this low for his own greed is beyond dishonoring his ancestors. He no longer has any validity in the eyes of fellow Hawaiians.

  5. Joe June 7, 2019 2:39 pm Reply

    Zuckerberg is an enemy of freedom. Get off Facebook, crush him locally, shun him, shun his guests, boycott anyone who does business with him, from his lawyer to his gardner.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, send us an email.