Salary histories off limits

HILO — Employers in Hawaii no longer will be allowed to inquire about prospective employees’ salary histories thanks to a law passed in July.

Senate Bill 2351, referred to as the Equal Pay Act, was signed into law by Gov. David Ige in July and went into effect Jan. 1. The law is intended to address demographic wage gaps within the state.

The law prohibits employers from asking job applicants about their pay rates at previous jobs, or using the applicants’ salary histories to determine their pay and benefits at their new job, unless the prospective employee discloses that information without prompting.

Even if an employer learns an applicant’s wage history through a background check, the employer still cannot use that information to determine how to pay the applicant, if hired.

The law also prohibits employers from punishing or prohibiting employees who openly discuss their wages with other employees.

Judi Mellon, director for the East Hawaii Small Business Development Center, said the new law will require businesses in the state, even small businesses, to update their hiring practices.

While Mellon said small businesses likely don’t have enough employees doing the same jobs for wage discrepancies to be a concern, the businesses still need to comply with the law.

“It isn’t going to have a big effect on small businesses here except that they have to be aware of the changes,” Mellon said.

A preamble to the bill discusses the existence of demographic wage gaps in Hawaii. According to the measure, in 2015 the gender wage gap in the state stood at 16 cents on the dollar — meaning that for every dollar earned by a man in the state, a woman would only earn an average of 84 cents.

The bill also acknowledged that racial wage gaps were more severe. Black and Asian women receive only an average of 73 cents per dollar earned by a Caucasian man, while Hispanic women only receive an average of 67 cents.

Native Hawaiian men and women also are significantly impacted, with Hawaiian men earning on average $7,621 less annually than the average total male salary in the state, with Hawaiian women earning $5,967 less than the total female average, and $19,014 less than the total male average.

These wage gaps, the bill argues, are perpetuated by the practice of employers inquiring about salary history. For example, when interviewing for a potential job, female applicants might disclose their lower salary history at the interviewer’s request, leading to the employer offering a lower salary as a result.

“Some people might see it as taking away bargaining power,” Mellon said. “But I don’t.”

Mellon said the new requirements force businesses to have a set salary in mind for a position regardless of the applicant.

The bill does not specify any penalties for noncomplying businesses, but Tom Heinrich, a legislative aid for Oahu Sen. Brian Taniguchi, said violations of the law would be under the enforcement jurisdiction of the Hawaii Civil Rights Commission, which handles other employer discrimination issues.

•••

Email Michael Brestovansky at mbrestovansky@hawaiitribune-herald.com.

4 Comments
  1. manawai January 3, 2019 7:35 am Reply

    In many jobs, speaking decent English is an important factor in customer service and inter-employee communications. Right or wrong, how one speaks is often a determining factor in building confidence.


  2. harry oyama January 3, 2019 8:31 am Reply

    This law does not matter if race profiling is down, which is very common in Hawaii. For instance who do you think will get the higher compensation pay if the employer is Japanese and there are two applicants for the job, one Hawaiian and the other Japanese?

    It can be verified easily by just looking at the list of those hired in higher paying positions in the State and County lists. Just open a phone directory and see who’s on the white collar list of the Board of Water Supply, DOE management levels and other State agencies including UH Manoa.

    Yes you got it, mostly Japanese even though the fact that they only consists of 17% of Hawaii’s population but represents over 67% of the work force. Quite a huge discrepancy of racist policy, yet no one is persecuted for this?


  3. gordon oswald January 3, 2019 9:48 am Reply

    Once again the Socialist, big Government Pig State rears it’s ugly head and decides out of some stretch of “Political Correctness” to micromanage to death the very businesses that make our economy grow for all races, creeds, and colors. How stupid we are. On another note, Harry, what if the Japanese worker comes from a group that is known for outworking, out smarting, and out performing the other group to such a great extent that it is obvious? That is the reality! When Government micromanages “reality” into bad management, and the resultant failure of a company to be profitable, WE ALL LOSE! Even the ones who are willing to work circles around their lazy worker competition lose incentive to work hard and become as lazy and unproductive as the other guy. If that reality breaks down by race, SO BE IT!


  4. Japones January 3, 2019 10:47 am Reply

    The reason is they have support by the Japanese Yakuza that runs the stage of Hawaii. This multinational criminal organization has suffocated the State of Hawaii with the intent to punish the people who supported the US during WWII.

    Some Japones people are cool but many feel entitled and they will get all the good paying jobs. You forgot to take a look at military contract jobs as well as the trades.

    It’s a huge disparity that proves plantation style discrimination in Hawaii is alive and well.


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, send us an email.