County asks lawmakers to mull $680M disaster recovery plan

  • Hollyn Johnson / Tribune-Herald file photo

    Fissure 8 feeds the river of lava last month in Leilani Estates.

Hawaii County has increased the price tag of its draft Kilauea disaster recovery plan to $680 million as administrators begin to make their pitch to state lawmakers.

The proposal, which remains a work in progress, goes beyond providing housing for those displaced by the eruption or relocating farmers. It also seeks to create new or improved economic centers in the underserved district, and a redevelopment agency with authority to make it happen.

Roy Takemoto, an executive assistant to Mayor Harry Kim, said the intent is to take the opportunity to make Puna a more “sustainable” place to live.

“Because right now, it’s substandard subdivisions,” he said, “and awful traffic. And if we just threw people into the existing pattern of development, we’re just going to exacerbate that situation.”

The bulk of the funding is expected to come from federal sources, assuming the recovery grants are approved, he said. The state could be asked to chip in a net amount of $150 million, with the county contributing $35 million based on the most recent estimates, he said.

But lawmakers aren’t giving the county the green light yet for a special session of the Legislature, which Takemoto said needs to be held before October. Otherwise, the requests would have to wait until the 2019 regular session.

During a meeting Monday, leaders in the Legislature and representatives from Hawaii Island met with county officials to discuss the recovery proposal.

State Sen. Kai Kahele, D-Hilo, said the legislators told Kim they need more information before convening a special session that would be needed to approve more aid. He said the county was given two weeks to come back with more information about what it needs in the short-term for funding and how it has spent the $12 million Gov. David Ige provided for disaster response.

“I think the basic bottom line is the Legislature wants to help,” Kahele said. “In what shape or form, we’re not sure. We’re waiting for the county to tell us what they need.”

There were concerns that legislators who represent the disaster area weren’t involved early enough in the process, he said.

“The communication between the county administration and the legislators, especially the area legislators, up to this point has not been good,” Kahele said.

Takemoto said the county wanted to present a fuller picture before bringing everyone to the table.

“I think the first thing was to have something that everybody could give feedback on,” he said.

Puna Councilwoman Eileen O’Hara said there are still pieces missing.

  1. harry oyama August 16, 2018 2:08 am Reply

    Why should non-residents outside of Big Island pay for rebuilding Puna district that was wiped out by the recent lava flows when insurance companies will NOT cover any of these homes because of the threat from the volcano? After all these years of these residents paying property taxes to the county of Big Island’s government who knew very well one day it would be wiped out, now wants residents who do not live here to pay for their neglience for spending $millions collected over the years instead of investing it as was done on Oahu for hurricane insurance?

    Harry Kim and his budget manager both had secondary beach front homes in Wonderland Estates, a gated exclusive community that was also wiped out. So he has a conflict of interest in this $650 million taxpayer bailout on top of that $10 billion dollar Rail white elephant that both will over burden Hawaii’s residents with taxes. This is what you get for electing Democrats that controlled Hawaii for over 50 years, more taxes for corrupt officials.

    So think twice about electing the same crooks that are trying to rob you blind this November election.

  2. I saw a Vampire once August 16, 2018 5:55 pm Reply

    Please prove your mayor is of any use. Tax hike to SBA. Hotel tax. But then again, who cares?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, send us an email.