Monday, June 27, 2022 |
Share this story
• New petroleum pipelines
New petroleum pipelines
The Times, London, May 25, 2005
The formal opening today of the $4 billion pipeline to carry oil more than 1,000 miles from the Caspian to the Mediterranean is a triumph of Western engineering, a strategic coup in the competition with Russia for influence in its former republics and a tribute to the acumen of BP, which holds the principal stake in the international consortium. This “project of the century”, which will eventually be linked to the huge Kazakh oilfields in Central Asia, has been built, on time and within budget, in the face of strong opposition from Moscow. It is crucial in lessening Western dependence on oil from the Middle East. And it is an impressive demonstration of technology given that the pipeline traverses some of the roughest topography, political as well as physical, in the world.
It would be unwise, however, to conclude that the pipeline has secured the West’s energy future. Despite the vast proven resources of the Caspian and Central Asia, the world’s thirst for oil is growing at an exponential rate. The West, therefore, should use the time it has bought and its superior technology to invest seriously, and on a massive scale, into alternative energy sources. This does not simply mean building more unsightly windfarms and waxing lyrical about wave power. Far more important is the search for an alternative to the internal combustion engine, the biggest consumer of petrol and one of the biggest sources of carbon emissions.
At last, the signs are that Western governments and industry are committing themselves seriously to an old idea whose time, thanks to technological breakthroughs, may soon come: the hydrogen fuel cell. Since October, General Motors and Toyota, both leaders in research, have been holding talks about a joint factory to produce hydrogen-powered cars, which would speed up adoption of this environment-friendly technology. …
It will take the combined resources and commitment of Western governments, big business and Japanese research to make fuel cells a reality. Their energies should be released now. The new pipeline shows what international cooperation can achieve, but this is merely a petrol station en route to energy security.
Yomiuri Shimbun, Tokyo, May 25
Initially, Beijing said Vice Premier Wu Yi had to “attend to emergency public duties” when it explained why she had to return home immediately. On Tuesday, however, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman issued a statement citing strong dissatisfaction felt by Beijing about remarks made by Japanese leaders, including Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi, about repeated visits to Yasukuni Shrine by the prime minister as a reason for its decision to cancel Wu’s planned meeting with the prime minister.
A memorial service for fallen soldiers in any country is to be held in accordance with that nation’s culture and tradition. Admittedly, there are arguments among Japanese for and against prime ministerial visits to the shrine, which enshrines Class-A war criminals. However, the controversy should never be settled through interference by another country. It should be recognized … that China — not Japan — has been responsible for hampering efforts to improve the relationship between the two nations in recent years. Beijing’s actions deserve to be seen as moves no one wants to look at and as a possible attempt to destroy a building in a moment.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
By participating in online discussions you
acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful
discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments
are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines,
send us an email.