ENDORSEMENT The University of Hawai’i wants its independence. With its growing reputation as a highly respected institution of higher learning, voters should grant UH that right by approving state constitution amendment no. 1 in the general election next Tuesday. The
ENDORSEMENT
The University of Hawai’i wants its independence. With its growing
reputation as a highly respected institution of higher learning, voters should
grant UH that right by approving state constitution amendment no. 1 in the
general election next Tuesday.
The change that the university’s leaders
have campaigned for aggressively would give UH more responsibility and
accountability for the operations of its 10 campuses statewide, including
Kaua’i Community College. That’s the way a university should run. The
Legislature, which earlier this year sent the proposed amendment on to voters
for their decision, would retain certain controls over UH, such as state
funding. But decision-making authority on questions dealing directly with
serving students would shift to UH’s administrators and trustees if the
amendment passes.
One key advantage of doing it the way the amendment
proposes is that the university would be able to regulate the spending of money
in its budget. The amendment would do away with a state law that has put limits
on the mingling of state money and private donations for the university. As a
result, spending decisions have been more complicated than they need to be when
the bottom line is making UH a reputable and student-friendly place of learning
and research, where academia prepares future government, corporate and
community leaders and also fosters thinking on present-day issues.
Any
opposition to the amendment seems to center on concern that the Legislature
could overpower the UH trustees any time it wants to by passing a law of
“statewide concern,” an amendment provision that keeps some control over the
university in state hands. But that hypothesis isn’t enough to put the value of
university autonomy in serious question.
The issue does, however, face a
potential obstacle from a quirk in election rules. Voters who don’t mark their
ballot yes or no on the autonomy question – who just leave it blank – could in
effect help defeat the measure. Blanks are counted in the total number of votes
cast, and a simple majority of votes – at least 50 percent plus one – will
decide the outcome. Depending on the percentage of total votes that are yes, no
or blank, the blanks could tip the scales in favor of the nays. Without going
deeper into the mathematical possibilities, suffice to say that since their
ballots will count even if they’re blank, voters should study the issue and
then can cast a ballot on one side or the other – preferably on the yes
side.