The editorial “More than one way for justice to be served” (Oct. 17) should not go unchallenged. Nor should Kaua’i’s Criminal Diversion Project go unchallenged. Stated plainly, the problem is that government bureaucrats believe that settling property crime through successful
The editorial “More than one way for justice to be served” (Oct. 17) should not
go unchallenged. Nor should Kaua’i’s Criminal Diversion Project go
unchallenged.
Stated plainly, the problem is that government bureaucrats
believe that settling property crime through successful mediation between
criminal and victim is all that is at stake. However, far more urgent than the
interests of victim and the criminal are the interests of the public.
Criminals, in fact, do not violate victims per se. Criminals violate state and
county laws. These laws should not be trivialized or ignored simply because the
looter has returned the stolen booty and the shopkeeper or homeowner is
grateful.
There is a public interest here that is vital. The burglar that
is free from serving lockup time may now be checking out your home for a
break-in, dear gentle reader.
The taxpayer money that went to the policing
and prosecuting departments for catching and trying criminals could be
recklessly wasted. The taxpayers are shelling out bucks for policemen to
apprehend criminals only to have lazy out-to-lunch prosecutors release the
culprits who are successful at mediation.
The Democrat Legislature on O’ahu
is ideologically opposed to building a desperately-needed prison. The ACLU and
the federal judiciary are pressuring state government to resolve the inhuman
overcrowding at obsolete centers of incarceration. The logical fix would be to
build a new prison. But the government of Hawai’i is a logic-free zone.
Consequently, the fun and games of the Criminal Diversion Project are put
into play. By diverting hoodlums, there is less overcrowding in jailhouses and
there is less pressure for building a new prison. In short, the Criminal
Diversion Project is a public-be-damned project. It is the public that will be
exposed to the many diverted hoods who should have been jailed.
Crime
abatement pro bono publico is a concept of no value to what TGI calls “the
forward-thinking legal authorities.” If one goes to the Honolulu Zoo, one can
see a mimicry of Hawaii’s “forwarding-thinking legal authorities.” The primates
there are busy catching fleas in the folds of their anatomies. These monkeys
alone benefit from this concentrated activity.
DOUGLAS E.
RAPOZO
Kapa’a