Swain’s questions were pertinent

I read with great interest Ms. Freeman’s recent letter declaring Councilman

Billy Swain unfair when he questioned a speaker at a recent public hearing

concerning a development on the west side very near the water. The woman who

spoke before the council, a local representative of a national environmental

group, expressed her opinion that the development should not be permitted, as

it was too close to the water.

Trying to elicit information about what

amount of setback would be acceptable to the speaker, Councilman Swain asked

several followup questions. She responded with a specific number of feet.

The exchange that Ms. Freeman found objectionable occurred when Mr. Swain

politely asked whether the speaker didn’t, in fact, live on the water, herself.

She responded that while that was true, she didn’t see the relationship between

one and the other.

Now, I don’t know about you, but I like it when my

elected officials try to understand all of the factors bearing on a specific

decision. I do not think it impolite, and, in fact, value someone who thinks it

is important to live and act consistently with his or her espoused views. We

should applaud Councilman Swain for his diligence.

Don S.




Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, send us an email.