Rules for some? Not othersTo the Forum:

I was saddened and dismayed when I saw the berm erected on the Pfleuger

development which interrupts the lovely view of the ocean from the highway. I

know many other people on Kaua’i felt and do feel the same way.

Now,

however, after the article in The Garden Island that said our County Engineer,

Caesar Portugal, prematurely allowed the massive dirt work to proceed without

the proper County permits in place, and furthermore, that it was his

engineering company which was hired to do all the work, I feel anger at the

blatant disrespect for the rules and regulations which are supposed to be for

the welfare of the island as a whole and which most people are made to

follow.

It is especially disturbing to learn from the article that the

extensive moving of dirt in that development impacts the water resources of

native Hawaiian kuleana lands.

Also, the rationalizing by Mr. Portugal

that only a modest number of homes would be built on the sizable area ignores

the fact that as ag lots it is possible for the lots when sold to be promptly

condominized and for several times Mr. Portugal’s projected number of dwellings

then to be constructed.

Finally and sadly, the Pfleuger/Portugal deal

reinforces once again the perception that the way to do business on Kaua’i is

based on mutual back scratch.

I appreciate the fact that the berm will

protect the privacy and view of the future owners of the lots, and I am sure

that Mr. Pfleuger will do an excellent job of landscaping the berm, but the

benefits to the people who buy the lots comes at a cost to the island as a

whole.

I hope that the Board of Ethics will take this matter under

consideration since the role of the County Engineer and Portugal &

Associates in the Pfleuger development appears to be a direct conflict of

interest and a violation of the County ethics code.

Unfortunately, in

addition to the ethical aspects of a County official’s company’s involvement in

the construction of the Pfleuger berm, it also appears that while the County

says it wants to preserve the “view plane” it does not do so when powerful

development interests are involved.

June Stark

0 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, send us an email.